原帖由
黑海龍王 於 2010-3-27 02:45 PM 發表

我一向見人講人話,見鬼講鬼話
你做初一,我做十五,同你講禮儀?同你講禮儀的話只係「禮儀」俾你遭塌罷了
哈,問我知唔知醜,我可以話俾你聽,我更知道咩叫「廉」同「恥」囉。
我就是知道自己都錯什麼,所以自動叫版 ...
睇你up左第一段一大輪,
After I have seen what you have typed in para. 1,
I knew you din't know what"禮義廉恥" are.
If you still don't know wt i hv said,
I tell u once again 'I know what is "shame", so surrendered to the moderator.
The one who speak without argument, pointed out that the other person rationale is sophistry,
just really because he himself don't have arguments.
If you would like to use "human dog theory" to explain you are at one's wit's end. That's fine~
「既然我都UP左,why仲要執著之前我冇講?
這一系列「罵戰」「理論」是有必要出現?」
That I hv explained yo u that, 'war of the words' are really not necessary to come out,
it is just depend on you,when you have said when would u leave.
Since the 'war of words' happan before u hv said when u leave, so it's not responsible for me.
Lastly, when the all the people in the world become crazy, just only u are not,
then, u think think who is the abnormal person.
原帖由
黑海龍王 於 2010-3-27 02:49 PM 發表
你個腦究竟諗咩
我有質疑他所引用出來的東西?
而是他有否引用錯是否胡亂的問題
就因為他不是醫生
依你這幾句的說話所推斷。
就是可說「一個人因為他不是醫生就不能引醫生的說話」對嗎?